Rules & Suggestions for Comments
This is Jane. She is a generous and tolerant soul, but she doesn’t suffer a lot of nonsense. She hates internet flamethrowers, and will blast the head off of comments that are designed purely to provoke a lot of anonymous bullshit and bravado from behind a keyboard.
Jane loves to hear a good discussion, even a sharp one, as long as it doesn’t get personal. She’s a stick to the subject kind of person. She’s also not willing to listen to xenophobic, racist, sexist, and homophobic slurs. Engage in any of that, and your life expectancy in the Comments Column will be pretty brief.
Jane, as you know, is a woman. She has visited other lists and blogs, and she’d like you to know - especially the guys - that a lot of these discussions are not very welcoming spaces for women because of the way men behave on them. She suggests that men edit themselves for the following:
(1) Macho debating styles that attempt to crush opponents
(2) Grandiose cyber-Personnae
(3) Unexamined language embedded with sexist notions
(4) Suggestions about your sexual prowess (no one believes it or cares)
(5) Tendencies to simply pronounce approval or disapproval (like an appointed judge) instead of addressing the content of an argument
(6) Tough-guy talk (Jane is tougher than you are, and unimpressed.)
Jane wants more women’s voices in these discussions, so help us out with this, you guys.
This is Jane’s house, and while she is tolerant, she does not recognize anyone’s unconditional ‘right’ to run around the house doing the first thing that comes into his head. She is a very hospitable person, but that doesn’t mean anything goes.
Some people think ‘anything goes’ is somehow ‘democratic.’ Not Jane. Jane says that when there are no rules, then the loudest, most obnoxious bully dominates the room. Jane believes that democratic discussions need rules… not decrees, but rules that define mutual respect, human decency, and good will.
Jane thanks you.
dan allosso:
FYI — good new “In These Times” post on 2004 election fraud. I added some links on Diebold vote systems and earlier articles which might be of interest: http://homepage.mac.com/allosso/iblog/C1507411961/E1613227527/index.html Ciao! –Dan
15 February 2005, 11:07 amNeil Cafferky:
What no male posturing? No random provocation? No braggadocio? Ok then here goes… er… hmmm… back in a minute.
17 February 2005, 10:05 amBilly Kelly:
Sai Gon, Viet Nam 14 April 2005
William (Billy) J. Kelly Jr.
Proposals, Suggestions, Comments
VFP Convention 2005
Xin Chao Cac Ban,
I feel a bit reticent in sending this because I am so far away from the fray. But I hope to return to the US of A with renewed vim & vigor in a few months. I would hope this might be posted for all to think about and possibly begin a debate that I feel is of extreme necessity. I will try to send some ideas and proposals piecemeal.
1) DRAFT: Whether we like it or not, there very well may be a call for such. I feel a great majority of our compadres are adamantly against such. I am not. Ever since seeing Doc Strangelove and living under Doc Kissinger, I have been fearful of a professional military. They are neither good nor bad but the fact that most are lifers means they have bought into the system. I celebrate the ‘citizen-soldier’. He/She keeps them honest.
But I call for a no-exception draft. Put your number in the hat and let fate have its way.
And…I would like to see a true national service commitment. Again, no exceptions. Kerry briefly mentioned such in his campaign but it seemed to ‘disappear’ itself rather abruptly. I have worked all of this out for a long-time, down to the dollars and cents, and feel it is viable and I truly believe I could present a ‘plan’ that would guarantee that in a generation there would be no more ‘gratuitous’ wars. I will follow-up on THAT proposal at a later date.
I know the ‘cons’ to a draft are many and I am well aware of them.
Some ‘pros’.
1) If ‘no-exception’, there would be an immediate hue and cry from the ‘worthies’ in our society. We could call them on that. They love to ‘talk the talk’ but let’s see if they can ‘walk the walk’.
2) If such ever did get through our ‘congress’, there would be a real public discussion emanating from our fellow citizens any time we heard the word ‘war’ mentioned. The cowardly media-entertainment complex might even find some ‘cojones’. You can be damn sure there would be none of our troops in Iraq today if they were ‘our’ soldiers. I believe strongly that our fellow citizens think of those in the military today as ‘them’, the other.
3) War should be the absolute last resort. At this time in civilization’s ‘maturity’, unfortunately we cannot dismiss the possibility that some day our ‘freedoms’ will come under attack. Doubly unfortunately, they now seem to be under attack from within by our very own government.
4) If we ‘co-opt’ this issue and make it our own and on our own terms, we, as veterans will have that special ‘gravitas’ to speak about how such should work.
5) Possibly the most important result of our actions, as VFP, is that we can break down some of the reticence of our fellow vets to speak up. I could even envision a strategic alliance, pro tem and ad hoc, with the likes of the VFW, VVA, MOPH et al.
I have just finished a startling, powerful and frightening book by Peter Singer, “Corporate Warriorsâ€. It was written before Iraq II and the frightening part is in the implications of the new euphemism for mercenaries, ‘contractors’. In a flight of whimsy, I thought, after the Afghan episode, we would sign up the Northern Alliance to do our ‘wet-work’ as Stan Goff likes to term it. Mercenaries, however one wishes to term them, are not new in history. In fact a citizen/soldier is the aberration. Janissary?
It is believed that the second largest contingent in our ‘coalition partnership’ is that of these contractors. Thus, the question of a draft could be made moot if there is an unwatched and unregulated infusion of ‘for hire guns’. Should we be concerned about this?
I was taken aback by an article in the NYTimes of about a year ago. Lead paragraph: “….Rumsfeld, seeking to increase the nation’s combat power without ‘hiring’ more troops, is poised to order a sweeping review of Pentagon policies. It will include everything from wartime mobilization and peace-keeping commitments, to reservist training and incentives for extended duty.â€( italics are mine) 23 August 2003-2004(?) by Thom Shanker. Sorry, I did not keep the year!!
That word, hiring, hit me in the gut. I had never heard such before in relation to our soldiers. Now we hear ‘honoring contracts’ and so on, on a daily basis. If we grant the premise that we still need a military, how can we permit it to be turned into nothing more than another job. I realize the ‘cons’ are strong to my proposal but feel by co-opting such debate we can get the truth out and call the bluff of the warmongers in our hijacked ‘democracy’.
Next chapter! A parallel or shadow VFP government watch. An idea with its gestation in Jonathan Schell’s masterpiece “The Unconquerable World†and a speech by the inimitable Congressman Jim McDermott.
14 April 2005, 9:09 amRuss Ford:
I beleive the draft is a bad idea and will not support it
15 June 2005, 7:38 amRuss Ford drafted VietNam vet
John Camp Bernays LLd:
Stan Goff…I have Read some of your writings…I post this here to give ALL a idea of MY Chief Field of Study. I really believe this “IDEA” is Plausable & Possable….Being from a Mixed Cherokee/Jewish family.
From: “BoxCar Bertha Butts”
Date: Wed May 19, 2004 9:41 am
Subject: GLOBALISTS plan to KILL YOU & YOUR FAMILY! hobogoddessq…
Agenda
Stanley K. Monteith, M.D.
One of the most difficult concepts for Americans to accept is that
there are human beings dedicated to coercive population control and
genocide. Many readers will acknowledge that our government is
helping to finance the Red Chinese program of forced abortion, forced
sterilization, infanticide, and control of the numbers of live
births. Most readers will accept the fact that our nation is helping
to finance the United Nations’ world-wide “family planning program,”
a form of population control. Most rational men and women, however,
find it impossible to believe that such programs are really part of
a “master plan” to kill off large segments of the world’s population.
I shall have to admit that I studied the politics of AIDS (HIV
disease) for over a decade before I finally came to a horrifying
conclusion. The real motivation behind efforts to block utilization
of standard public health measures to control further spread of the
HIV epidemic was “population control.” That was not an easy concept
for me to acknowledge, despite the fact that I had long recognized
that the twentieth century has been the bloodiest hundred-year period
in all recorded human history.
It was not until I journeyed to Elberton, Georgia, stood within the
dark shadows of the great Druid-like monument built there, and read
the words engraved on the massive stone pillars of that structure
that I finally came to accept the truth. At that point it became
obvious that just as our Lord has given mankind Ten Commandments to
guide our lives, so, too, those from “the dark side” have been given
their instructions from the “one” they worship. The ten programs of
the “guides” are inscribed in eight different languages on the four
great granite pillars of the American Stonehenge. That message
foretells a terrifying future for humanity, and explains why efforts
to approach the AIDS epidemic from a logical point of view have been
consistently thwarted.1
Before you scoff, and reject my suggestion as some sort of madness,
check out my references, then try to disprove my conclusions. If my
allegations are unfounded, you will soon recognize the deception and
return to your daily activities, certain that there is no cause for
concern. On the other hand, should you determine that my assessment
is correct, or even partially correct, then you have a moral
obligation to decide just what part you intend to play in response to
the unfolding world genocide - how you will protect yourself, your
loved ones, and the countless millions of helpless human beings
throughout the world who have been marked for destruction.
You must never forget the warning recorded for posterity by Martin
Niemoeller, the Lutheran minister who lived in Hitler’s Germany
during the 1930s and 1940s. His words echo down to us over succeeding
decades:
“In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up
because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I
didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade
unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was
a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left
to speak up.” 2
You will note that Reverend Niemoeller warned that after coming for
the Jews the Nazis came for both Catholics and Protestants. Why is
that fact never mentioned? The question that I am most frequently
asked is, “How can you possibly believe that there are people who
intend to kill off large segments of the world’s population?” My
answer is really quite simple. I hold that belief because I have read
their writings. I believe they are telling the truth. Just as Adolf
Hitler wrote of his plans for Europe in “Mein Kampf” (My Plan), so,
too, those who intend to depopulate large segments of the earth have
written of the necessity of limiting the world’s population. They
fully intend to “exterminate” a significant portion of the world’s
population. The fact that the vast majority of Americans have never
heard of their intent, of The Georgia Guidestones in Elberton, or
of “The Plan” and “The
Hierarchy” attests to the degree of control that exists over what the
American people have been allowed to know about the occultic forces
which are working within our society today.
Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood
As you read on you will soon discover that I have primarily relied on
material which can be readily found in books, audio-taped interviews,
and public news sources. If you take the time to check my references,
you will soon discover that there really are those who have publicly
advocated the elimination of “human weeds” and “the cleansing of
society.” Indeed, to this very day your tax money is used to finance
Planned Parenthood, an organization founded by Margaret Sanger.
During the 1930s Margaret Sanger openly supported the Nazi plan for
genetic engineering of the German population, and the propagation of
a “super race.”
In Planned Parenthood’s 1985 “Annual Report” leaders of that
organization proclaimed that they were, “Proud of our past, and
planning for our future.” 3
How could anyone possibly claim to be proud of the organization
founded by Margaret Sanger when history records that she wrote of the
necessity of: “the extermination of ‘human weeds’ …the ‘cessation
of charity,’ … the segregation of ‘morons, misfits, and the
maladjusted,’ and … the sterilization of ‘genetically inferior
races.’”4
Margaret Sanger published “The Birth Control Review.” In that
magazine she openly supported the “infanticide program” promoted by
Nazi Germany in the 1930s, and publicly championed Adolf Hitler’s
goal of Aryan white supremacy. In the years prior to World War II
Margaret Sanger commissioned Ernst Rudin, a member of the Nazi Party,
and director of the dreaded German Medical Experimentation Programs,
to serve as an advisor to her organization. In his excellent
book “Killer Angel,” George Grant chronicles the life and writings of
Margaret Sanger, and painstakingly documents Sanger’s plans for the
genetic engineering of the human race. George Grant noted that in the
1920s Margaret Sanger wrote “The Pivot of Civilization” in which she
called for:
“The ‘elimination of ‘human weeds,’ for the ‘cessation of charity’
because it prolonged the lives of the unfit, for the segregation
of ‘morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,’ and for the sterilization
of genetically inferior races.’”5
ccording to George Grant, Margaret Sanger believed that the unfit
should not be allowed to reproduce. Accordingly, she opened a birth
control clinic in: “The Brownsville section of New York, an area
populated by newly immigrated Slavs, Latins, Italians, and Jews. She
targeted the ‘unfit’ for her crusade to ’save the planet.’” 6
Nineteen years later, in 1939, Margaret Sanger organized her “Negro
project,” a program designed to eliminate members of what she
believed to be an “inferior race.” Margaret Sanger justified her
proposal because she believed that: “The masses of
Negroes …particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and
disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even
more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least
intelligent and fit…” 7
Margaret Sanger then went on to reveal that she intended to hire
three or four Colored Ministers “to travel to various black enclaves
to propagandize for birth control.” She wrote: “The most successful
educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We
do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro
population, and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that
idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
(emphasis added-Ed.) 8
As Margaret Sanger’s organization grew in power, influence, and
acceptance, she began to write of the necessity of targeting
religious groups for destruction as well, believing that
the “dysgenic races” should include “Fundamentalists and Catholics”
in addition to “blacks, Hispanics, (and) American Indians.” 9
As the years went by, Margaret Sanger became increasingly obsessed
with her occultic beliefs. Along with her acceptance of the occult,
she became increasingly hostile to both Christianity and the American
precepts of individual freedom under God. Her distaste for America
can be seen in her writings when she wrote: “Birth control appeals to
the advanced radical because it is calculated to undermine the
authority of the Christian churches. I look forward to seeing
humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than
Capitalism.” 10 Margaret Sanger eventually embraced not only
communism but theosophy as well. What is theosophy? It is a covert,
occultic religion based upon the repudiation of God and the worship
of Lucifer. In modern-day America, theosophy is one of the most
powerful hidden (occult) forces working behind the scenes in New York
City, Washington D.C., and across our nation today. 11
How many times have you been told that Adolf Hitler killed 6 million
Jews in the Holocaust? What you probably have never been told,
however, is the segment of the Holocaust tragedy recorded by
Professor Norman Cohn in his historical account of the Jewish
Holocaust, “Warrant for Genocide.” Professor Cohn chronicled the dark
days of World War II, noting: Only about a third of the civilians
killed by the Nazis and their accomplices were Jews …Other peoples
were marked out for decimation, subjugation, and enslavement, and the
civilian losses of some of these (countries - Ed.) amounted to 11 per
cent to 12 per cent of the total population.” 12
If Professor Cohn’s figures are accurate - and I feel certain that
they are, because other Jewish researchers have come up with similar
figures - then why haven’t the Christians of America been allowed to
learn the fact that in addition to the 6 million Jews murdered by the
Nazis, somewhere between 7 and 12 million non-Jews were also
ruthlessly liquidated in Hitler’s Germany?
I believe this information has been intentionally suppressed because
those who were killed were largely Christians, and the covert forces
which control the reality of the American public today do not want
the followers of Jesus Christ in our nation to awaken to their
peril …until it is far too late. Hitler hated not only Jews and
Judaism, he also hated Christians and Christianity as well. Why was
that? Because Adolf Hitler, just like Margaret Sanger, was a disciple
of theosophy and of Madame Blavatsky, the founder of a religion that
worshipped Lucifer. Accordingly, both Margaret Sanger and Adolf
Hitler were energized by the same “dark, spiritual forces.” The fact
that most of our citizens have never heard of Madame Blavatsky,
theosophy, or that two of theosophy’s most ardent disciples were
Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger clearly reflects the degree of
control that exists over what the American people have been allowed
to learn about the occultic forces at work in our nation today.
As a researcher on the subject of the occult, I regularly receive
letters and publications from the Lucis Trust. The Lucis Trust of
today is the modern-day extension of the “Lucifer Publishing
Company,” an organization founded by Alice Bailey during the early
years of the twentieth century. Alice Bailey was a disciple of Madame
Blavatsky and the nominal leader of the Theosophical Society between
the early 1900s and the late 1920s. Because the name “Lucifer” had
such a bad connotation in those days, Alice Bailey changed the name
of her organization from “The Lucifer Publishing Company” to “The
Lucis Trust.” The nature and beliefs of her organization, however,
have always remained the same. The Lucis Trust of today is one of the
major front groups through which theosophy works to influence life
here in America. The supernatural powers that still energize The
Lucis Trust today certainly come from the same dark, spiritual forces
that energized Madame Blavatsky, Adolf Hitler, and Margaret Sanger in
generations past.
Publications from The Lucis Trust regularly refer to “The Plan” for
humanity that has been established by “The Hierarchy.” Part of that
plan is inscribed on the great granite pillars of the American
Stonehenge in Elberton, Georgia … “The Georgia Guidestones.” 13
A full discussion on the subjects of population control and occultism
is far beyond the scope of this short monograph. Full documentation
on these subjects will be found in my soon-to-be-published
book, “None Dare Call It Genocide.” At this point let me simply offer
a few examples of the views expressed by those who publicly advocate
population reduction and/or genocide.
David Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service,
was quoted in the Los Angeles Times Book Review Section, October 22,
1989, as saying: “Human happiness and certainly human fecundity are
not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social
scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn’t
true … We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the
Earth …Until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin
nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.”
14
Michael Fox, when he was the vice-president of The Humane Society of
the United States wrote, “Mankind is the most dangerous, destructive,
selfish and unethical animal on the earth.” 15
In “The First Global Revolution,” published by The Council of the
Club of Rome, an international elitist organization, the authors note
that: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the
idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages,
famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused
by human intervention …The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
16
he Los Angeles Times of April 5, 1994 quoted Cornell University
Professor David Pimentel, speaking before the American Association
for the Advancement of Science, as saying that, “The total world
population should be no more than 2 billion rather than the current
5.6 billion.”
In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote: “The
damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - it
is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth
much more than twenty Bangladeshes … This is a terrible thing to
say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate
350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just
as bad not to say it.”17
Bertrand Russell, in his book, “The Impact of Science on Society,”
wrote, “At present the population of the world is increasing … War
so far has had no great effect on this increase … I do not pretend
that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept
from increasing. There are others … If a Black Death could be
spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could
procreate freely without making the world too full … the state of
affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-
minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of
others.” 18
egative Population Growth Inc. of Teaneck, New Jersey recently
circulated a letter stating their long-range goal. “We believe that
our goal for the United States should be no more than 150 million,
our size in 1950. For the world, we believe our goal should be a
population of not more than two billion, its size shortly after the
turn of the century.” 19
n the Global Assessment Report of UNEP (a United Nations sponsored
study group), Phase One Draft, Section 9, the authors quoted an
expert who suggested that: “A reasonable estimate for an
industrialized world society at the present North American material
standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European
standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” 20
More New Age Influence
Speaking at a round-table discussion group at the Gorbachev
Conference held in San Francisco in the fall of 1996, Dr. Sam Keen, a
New Age writer and philosopher stated that there was strong agreement
that religious institutions have to take a primary responsibility for
the population explosion. He went on to say that, “We must speak far
more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about
values that control the population, because the ecological crisis, in
short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there
aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Mr. Keen’s remarks were met with applause from the assembled audience
made up largely of New Age adherents, Socialists, Internationalists
and occultists. Many of the leading occultists of our modern world
attended that meeting in San Francisco, a meeting organized by
Mikhail Gorbachev, former Director of the Soviet KGB, and later
President of Russia. 21
What is the message found on The Georgia Guidestones? What is the
plan of the “guides”? If you read occultic literature, you will soon
find that those who worship Lucifer today refer to a “Hierarchy” that
guides both their actions and the affairs of the world. Who are
the “Hierarchy”? The Lucis Trust, formerly The Lucifer Publishing
Company, recently sent a letter to their supporters stating, “The
spiritual Hierarchy makes definite use of the twelve spiritual
Festival periods. We can learn to cooperate with the members of the
Hierarchy as they work to bring the divine Plan to the attention of
men and women of goodwill and spiritual aspiration everywhere
throughout the world. The idea of spiritual approach - of Hierarchy
to humanity and humanity to Hierarchy - is the primary principle
underlying meditation …understanding of how the spiritual energies
which flow through each zodiacal sign can illumine and inspire right
human relations.” 22
The ancient Druids were members of an occultic religion; the circle
of monuments at Stonehenge in England is occultic; and the message
engraved on the American Stonehenge in Elberton is occultic. Yoko Ono
is the widow of John Lennon, a man who was deeply involved in the
occult. Yoko Ono has written a musical score with three movements
dedicated to the message of The Georgia Guidestones. She was recently
quoted as saying, “I want people to know about the stones …We’re
headed toward a world where we might blow ourselves up and maybe the
globe will not exist … it’s a nice time to reaffirm ourselves,
knowing all the beautiful things that are in this country, and The
Georgia Stones symbolize that.” 23
What is the message to modern-day man which is engraved on the great
stone pillars of the Druid-like monument in Elberton? The first of
the “guides” reads: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual
balance with nature. (This-Ed.) Means the entire human race at its
climax level for permanent balance with nature.”
he Infamous Tuskegee Study
In recent history, we have seen the influence of occultic population
control advocates here in America. Nowhere is that influence better
demonstrated than in the Tuskegee Study, a scientific research
program in which 400 syphilis-infected black men were recruited by
the U.S. Public Health Service back in 1932. The participants were
all told that they would be treated for their infections, but instead
of treating their illness, all medicines were withheld. The black men
were then actively prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as
their bodies, and the bodies of their wives and children, were
systematically ravaged by disease.
The evil men who conceived that Nazi-style study justified their
atrocity by alleging that scientists needed to learn how untreated
syphilis progressed in the human body. For a period of forty years,
between 1932 and 1972, the genocidal Tuskegee Study continued. It was
not until 1972, when one newspaper finally had the courage to break
the story to the public, that the Tuskegee Study was finally
terminated. By that time, only 125 of the original 400 black men had
survived.
To this very day, 24 years after the end of that grotesque human
experiment, none of the perpetrators of that atrocity have ever been
either accused or indicted for their crimes. Back in 1932, when the
Tuskegee Study began, Margaret Sanger’s ideas had already begun to
infect the minds and souls of physicians and scientists here in
America. According to Margaret Sanger’s sense of morality,
experiments on “human weeds” were fully justified in the name
of “science.” Do you honestly believe for one moment that such an
experiment would have been tolerated here in America had the
participants been white men? 24
Another far more effective method of reducing the world population
was devised in the early 1960s by a group of environmentalists and
population-control adherents. They set out to block the use of DDT
for mosquito and malaria control after it had been found that the
insecticide was extremely effective in saving human lives.
Alexander King, president of the Club of Rome, wrote, “My own doubts
came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had
almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT,in hindsight,
is that it has greatly added to the population problem.” 25
In 1970 The National Academy of Sciences, in their book “Life
Sciences,” stated that, “In little more than two decades DDT has
prevented 500 million deaths due to malaria.”
To population-control advocates, this irresponsible preservation of
human life was unconscionable, so they set out to outlaw further use
of the pesticide. Up until 1970 all reliable scientific data had
consistently demonstrated that DDT was completely safe for both
humans and animals. Indeed, DDT was the safest pesticide ever known
to mankind. Furthermore, it was inexpensive and could be widely used
in third-world countries to control the spread of insect-borne
diseases. Accordingly, population-control adherents set out to have
DDT banned in the name of saving the environment.
You have probably read the contrived stories alleging that DDT caused
softening of eggshells, interfered with the balance of nature, and
endangered humanity by entering into the food chain. In truth, all of
those stories were fabricated, and were simply part of a carefully
coordinated program to block further use of the life-saving
pesticide. If you are interested in learning the truth concerning the
deceitful campaign waged against DDT, I suggest that you order a copy
of my audio-taped interviews with Dr. J. Gordon Edwards. Dr. Edwards
is a world-renowned biologist who led the fight in the 1960s to
counter the propaganda program waged by environmentalists and
population-control advocates to ban further use of DDT. You can also
order a copy of Dr. Edward’s excellent monograph, “Remembering Silent
Spring and its Consequences.”
William Ruckelshaus was a long-time member of the Environmental
Defense Fund, and the Director of the EPA. He outlawed further use of
DDT in 1972 despite the recommendation of the chairman of the EPA
investigating committee which had heard six months of testimony on
use of the pesticide, and had determined that DDT was completely
safe. When Ruckelshaus outlawed further use of DDT, he signed the
death warrant for hundreds of millions of helpless human beings
living in third-world countries. To those energized by the dark side,
however, the loss of hundreds of millions of human lives was
relatively inconsequential.
In his excellent monograph, “Remembering Silent Spring and its
Consequences,” Professor J. Gordon Edwards quoted from a speech
delivered by Victor Yanconne, founder of the Environmental Defense
Fund. In that talk, Mr. Yanconne related a story told to him by a
reporter who had asked Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major
opponents of DDT, whether a ban on DDT wouldn’t actually result in
far greater use of much more toxic pesticides. Dr. Wurster is
reported to have replied: “So what? People are the cause of all the
problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of
them and this is as good a way as any.” hen asked by the same
reporter, “Doctor, how do you square the killing of people with the
mere loss of some birds?” Dr. Wurster is reported to have
replied, “It doesn’t really make a lot of difference, because organo
phosphate acts locally and only kills farmworkers and most of them
are Mexicans and Negroes.” 26
How many people have died in the past 25 years since the use of DDT
was outlawed? If the National Academy of Sciences was correct in
their 1970 assessment that 500 million lives had been saved by DDT
over a twenty-year period, then we have probably lost well over 600
million human lives during the past twenty-five years since advocates
of population control succeeded in outlawing DDT. 27
The Relationship Between Abortion, Breast Carcinoma, and Population
Control
Let me offer another example of a population control program which is
being promoted here in the United States today. Many physicians have
expressed their concern about the dramatic increase in breast
carcinoma seen in women in recent years.
Despite the fact that 18 scientific studies published in both
domestic and foreign medical journals have clearly demonstrated the
direct causal relationship between first-trimester abortion and
breast cancer, all efforts to disseminate that information here in
the United States have been consistently blocked by those who favor
abortion and population control. In the fall of 1996 a new scientific
paper dealing with a meta-analysis of 23 different scientific studies
on the relationship between first-trimester abortions and breast
cancer was published in a British medical journal.
That study clearly demonstrated a higher incidence of breast cancer
in women who had had first-trimester abortions. In response to that
publication, the American Medical Association (AMA), the American
Cancer Society (ACS), and pro-abortion/population-control advocates
joined together in an unholy alliance to attack the conclusions of
the authors, and to block all efforts to disseminate that information
to American physicians. All of the organizations mentioned above
continue to oppose efforts to have physicians warn women of the risk
they face when they submit themselves to first-trimester abortions.
Before carrying out all surgical procedures in America “advised
consent” is required, except for abortion.
The AMA. the ACS, and the pro-death lobby continue to insist that
women must not be advised of the risk they incur when they destroy
the life of their unborn child. Why is there such inconsistency?
Current abortion policies in America are absolutely necessary to
reduce our population. That is why a minor child can be taken from
school to an abortion clinic without parental notification, yet that
same child cannot be given an aspirin without parental consent. It
all has to do with population control. 28
Population Control in Russia Today
Another dramatic example of population control is the tragedy being
played out in the “former” Soviet Union today in regard to male
longevity. In Russia, the life span of the average Russian male has
dropped precipitously over the past several decades. The average life
expectancy of an American male is 74-78 years of age, and in Japan
the average life span is 78 years, but the average life span of
Russian men has fallen from 68 years in the 1970s to 63.8 years in
1985, to 57.7 years in 1994. It is estimated that, if current trends
continue, the average life span of a Russian male will be 53 years
shortly after the turn of the century. Do you really believe that
this shocking reduction in life span is happening simply
by “accident”? The true cause of this dramatic reduction in life span
in Russia will be detailed in my coming book, “None Dare Call It
Genocide.” 29
The Massacres in Africa
Killer Angel: p 74: see also: Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: Linda
One has only to learn what really happened to the Christians in
Rwanda between April and July of 1994 to imagine what may lie in
store for Christians here in America at some time in the not-too-
distant future.
After the Christian Tutsis had been disarmed by governmental decree
in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically
massacre the defenseless Christians. The massacre began in April 1994
and continued until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets,
the Hutu forces were able to create a state of abject fear and terror
within the helpless Christian population as they systematically
butchered hundreds of thousands of them. The United Nations
immediately convened hearings on the genocide taking place in Rwanda,
but Madeline Albright, the American Ambassador to the United Nations,
argued strenuously that neighboring African nations should not be
allowed to intervene until the “civil war had come to an end.” In
reality, of course, there was no civil war since those being
slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it was
simply a matter of mass murder.
In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline
Albright also insisted that the word “genocide” must not be used, and
that the United Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be
allowed to intervene. In the three months that followed, between one-
half and three-quarters of a million Christians were systematically
dismembered, hacked to death, and slaughtered in the bloody carnage
that ensued. Tens of thousands of Christians were murdered in their
churches; tens of thousands more were murdered in their hospitals and
in their schools. On several occasions, United Nations soldiers
stationed in Rwanda actually handed over helpless Christians under
their protection to members of the Hutu militia. They then stood by
as their screaming charges were unceremoniously hacked to pieces.
At the end of the carnage, in late July 1994, the American government
rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid.
Strangely, the American press has remained silent about the fact that
almost all of those who were slaughtered were Christians, and it was
the policies of our government that were primarily responsible for
blocking efforts by neighboring African countries to intervene. 30
There are literally dozens of other examples of population- control
programs which have been implemented throughout our world by modern-
day “Malthusians” in their effort to ensure that the world population
is dramatically curtailed. To date it is estimated that far more than
one billion human lives have been terminated as a result of the world-
wide abortion programs financed by the United States. In addition, we
are beginning to see the devastating effects of the AIDS epidemic as
this modern-day plague begins to depopulate large areas of both Asia
and Africa. Because of the influence of occultic population
controllers, however, all logical efforts to address the HIV epidemic
throughout the world continue to be blocked. Rather than utilizing
the proven public health methods used with all other illnesses,
advocates of population control continue to promote both hedonistic
sex education and condom distribution. In the May 1996 issue
of “Special Warfare,” a publication of the John F. Kennedy Special
Warfare Center and School, it was noted that: “The immediate future
may present other daunting challenges to Civil Affairs units. Because
of complicated social and cultural reasons, AIDS already infects a
high proportion of the military and civilian officials of Zaire,
Uganda, Kenya, Zambia, and other central Africa countries. In some or
all of these countries, government establishments may collapse in the
next 10-15 years. If this pattern is repeated in other areas where
AIDS is spreading at an alarming rate, then civil rule may also erode
or break down in parts of North Africa, the Middle East, India, and
Southeast Asia.” 31
Let me assure you that there really are hundreds of thousands of
occultly energized people throughout the world today who honestly
believe that human compassion is outmoded, and that the inferior
peoples of the world must either be allowed to die or be actively
exterminated. I will conclude this monograph by quoting from the
writings of the English Churchman, Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834).
In his “An Essay on the Principle of Population,” Malthus wrote: “All
children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the
population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room
may be made for them by the deaths of grown
persons …Therefore …we should facilitate, instead of foolishly
and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in
producing this mortality…” 32
I personally believe that God expects each and every of us to become
involved in the affairs of this world until He returns. Furthermore,
I believe that all human life is sacred. We are told that Christians
are to be the “salt and light of the world,” the preservative that
keeps humanity from rotting. What is the Christian Church doing today
to preserve the lives of the inhabitants of God’s earth; what are you
doing to protect the lives of those who have been targeted by the
forces of darkness? Today, the AIDS epidemic is beginning to
depopulate both Africa and the non-Communist countries of Asia? What
can you do?
A. Order my taped interview with Peter Hammond which tells the story
of the murder of the Christian population of Rwanda.
B. Order my four-tape set on Population Control which includes
information on The Georgia Guidestones and the plan of the “guides.”
You have my permission to copy and distribute my audio tapes and this
monograph, in order to disseminate this information as far and wide
as possible.
C. Get involved in local political organizations. Speak out on these
matters on talk-radio, in your church, and to your friends. The life
you save could well be that of a loved one …a friend …or your own.
D. Finally, pray that our Lord will intervene, and that our nation
can be returned to Godly leadership.
Always remember the words of St. Paul from Ephesians 6:11-12 - “For
we struggle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,
against powers, against the forces of the darkness of this world,
against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
End Notes: 1) Copies of the material obtained in Elberton, Georgia,
on The Georgia Guidestones, and a four-audio-tape set on “Population
Control” are available from Radio Liberty: P.O. Box 13, Santa Cruz,
CA, 95063.
2) Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations: Fifteenth Edition: Little, Brown,
and Company: p. 824.
3) Killer Angel: George Grant: Reformer Press: p 105: available from
Radio Liberty: P.O. Box 13, Santa Cruz, CA, 95063.
4) ibid: page 65
5) ibid p 65, 71-72, 92: see also Pivot of Civilization: Sanger: New
York: Bretano’s: pp 101,108,123:
6) Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: Linda Gordon: New York: Penguin
Press: p 204: see also: Killer Angel: p 64
7) Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: p 332: see also Killer Angel: p 73
Gordon: New York: Penguin Press: pp 229-334.
9) Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: pp 229-334: see also Killer Angel: p
73
10) Killer Angel: p 104
11) Killer Angel: p 90: see also The Dark Side of Freemasonry:
Decker: Huntington House: p 71: equating Satan with the “white
deity”: see also: The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow:
Cumbey: Huntington House: available from Radio Liberty.
12) Warrant for Genocide: Cohn: Harper and Rowe: 1966: p 15.
13) Killer Angel: op cited: p 90: see also: Hitler and the New Age:
Rosio: Huntington House: Available from Radio Liberty. P.O. Box 13,
Santa Cruz, CA, 95063: see also the Radio Liberty interview with
Aaron Zellman: see also The Pagan Agenda: tape series available from
Radio Liberty: See also The Aquarian Conspiracy by Marylin Ferguson:
see also The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow: Constance Cumbey:
available from Radio Liberty.
14) Los Angeles Times: Book Review Section: October 22, 1989: p 9.
15) Animal Rights: A New Species of Egalitarianism: The Intellectual
Activist: September 14, 1983: p 3: Also quoted in The War on the
West: William Perry Pendley: Henry Regnery: p 15.
16) The First Global Revolution: Club of Rome, Alexander King and
Bertrand Schneider, 1991: Pantheon Books, New York, p 115
17) The Population Controllers: New American Magazine: June 27, 1994:
p 7.
18) The Impact of Science on Society: Bertrand Russell: 1953: p xv.
19) Material is available from Radio Liberty, P.O. Box 13, Santa
Cruz, CA, 95063.
20) The World Conservative Union: Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland,
Switzerland.
21) Copies of the text of Dr. Keen’s remarks are available from Radio
Liberty.
22) A copy of the letter quoted from The Lucis Trust is available
from Radio Liberty for researchers.
23) Quotation from Yoko Ono was found on the web site:
http:www.odysee.net%7Ericjoly/geostone.htlm#francisco. Copies
available from Radio Liberty for researchers.
24) AIDS and the Doctors of Death: Aries Rising Press: Los Angeles:
pp 168-170.
25) Remembering Silent Spring and its Consequences: J. Gordon
Edwards: a monograph: p 7: available from Radio Liberty, or from Dr.
Edwards at San Jose State University in San Jose, CA.
26) Reported by Chairman John Rarick: House Hearings on the Federal
Pesticide Control Act of 1971, pp 266-267, in Serial No 92-A: quoted
in a treatise by Dr. J. Gordon Edwards: A taped interview with Dr.
Edwards is available from Radio Liberty, as is his treatise: see also
Environmental Overkill: Dixy Lee Ray: Regnery: p 77.
27) Environmental Overkill: op cited: pp 76-77 and 192: see also my 2-
hour interview with Dr. Dixy Lee Ray: see also Dr. Edwards’ treatise
on DDT, available from Radio Liberty.
28) Strong Abortion-Breast Cancer Link Revealed: Washington Times:
October 12, 1996: A1.
29) Russia Strives to Reverse Population Shrinkage: Washington Times:
September 22, 1996: p A8.
30) An audio-taped interview with Peter Hammond of Front Line
Ministries is available from Radio Liberty: also see Holocaust in
Rwanda: Peter Hammond: available from In Touch Mission Int’l (ITMI),
P.O. Box 28240, Tempe, AZ, 85285.
31) Special Warfare: May 1996: PB 80-96-2: Special Operations and LIC
in the 21st Century: The Joint Strategic Perspective: Brian Sullivan:
p 2.
32) Killer Angel: op cited: pp 50-51.
The Georgia Guidestones
On one of the highest hilltops in Elbert County, Georgia stands a
huge granite monument. Engraved in eight different languages on the
four giant stones that support the common capstone are 10 Guides, or
commandments. That monument is alternately referred to as The Georgia
Guidestones, or the American Stonehenge. Though relatively unknown to
most people, it is an important link to the Occult Hierarchy that
dominates the world in which we live.
The origin of that strange monument is shrouded in mystery because no
one knows the true identity of the man, or men, who commissioned its
construction. All that is known for certain is that in June 1979, a
well-dressed, articulate stranger visited the office of the Elberton
Granite Finishing Company and announced that he wanted to build an
edifice to transmit a message to mankind. He identified himself as R.
C. Christian, but it soon became apparent that was not his real name.
He said that he represented a group of men who wanted to offer
direction to humanity, but to date, almost two decades later, no one
knows who R. C. Christian really was, or the names of those he
represented. Several things are apparent. The messages engraved on
the Georgia Guidestones deal with four major fields: (1) Governance
and the establishment of a world government, (2) Population and
reproduction control, (3) The environment and man’s relationship to
nature, and (4) Spirituality.
In the public library in Elberton, I found a book written by the man
who called himself R.C. Christian. I discovered that the monument he
commissioned had been erected in recognition of Thomas Paine and the
occult philosophy he espoused. Indeed, the Georgia Guidestones are
used for occult ceremonies and mystic celebrations to this very day.
Tragically, only one religious leader in the area had the courage to
speak out against the American Stonehenge, and he has recently
relocated his ministry.
THE MESSAGE OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with
nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered
reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a
world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room
for nature.
Limiting the population of the earth to 500 million will require the
extermination of nine-tenths of the world’s people. The American
Stonehenge’s reference to establishing a world court foreshadows the
current move to create an International Criminal Court and a world
government. The Guidestones’ emphasis on preserving nature
anticipates the environmental movement of the 1990s, and the
reference to “seeking harmony with the infinite” reflects the current
effort to replace Judeo-Christian beliefs with a new spirituality.
The message of the American Stonehenge also foreshadowed the current
drive for Sustainable Development. Any time you hear the
phrase “Sustainable Development” used, you should substitute the
term “socialism” to be able to understand what is intended. Later in
this syllabus you will read the full text of the Earth Charter which
was compiled under the direction of Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice
Strong. In that document you will find an emphasis on the same basic
issues: control of reproduction, world governance, the importance of
nature and the environment, and a new spirituality. The similarity
between the ideas engraved on the Georgia Guidestones and those
espoused in the Earth Charter reflect the common origins of both.
Yoko Ono, the widow of John Lennon, was recently quoted as referring
to the American Stonehenge, saying:
“I want people to know about the stones … We’re headed toward a
world where we might blow ourselves up and maybe the globe will not
exist … it’s a nice time to reaffirm ourselves, knowing all the
beautiful things that are in this country and the Georgia Stones
symbolize that. ” (1)
What is the true significance of the American Stonehenge, and why is
its covert message important? Because it confirms the fact that there
was a covert group intent on
(1) Dramatically reducing the population of the world.
(2) Promoting environmentalism.
(3) Establishing a world government.
(4) Promoting a new spirituality.
Certainly the group that commissioned the Georgia Guidestones is one
of many similar groups working together toward a New World Order, a
new world economic system, and a new world spirituality. Behind those
groups, however, are dark spiritual forces. Without understanding the
nature of those dark forces it is impossible to understand the
unfolding of world events.
The fact that most Americans have never heard of the Georgia
Guidestones or their message to humanity reflects the degree of
control that exists today over what the American people think. We
ignore that message at our peril.
Copies are available for researchers from Radio Liberty.
The Age of Reason was a book written by Thomas Paine. Its intent was
to destroy the Judeo-Christian beliefs upon which our Republic was
founded.
The hole that you see in the stone was drilled in the Center Stone so
that the North Star could be visualized through it at any moment.
This was one of several requirements stipulated by R.C.Christian for
the building of the American Stonehenge and reflects his obsession
with the alignment of the stars, the sun, and the moon. Occultists
often worship the alignment and movement of heavenly bodies as part
of their religious ceremonies.
Population Control
Why should anyone be concerned with the idea of population control in
today’s increasingly crowded world? The earth will soon pass seven
billion people and the number of people born into poverty is set to
rise. Increasingly the idea of controlling the world’s population
through non-coercive means is a topic of debate in the world’s
capitals. Should we be concerned? Should anyone be concerned with the
idea of population control as it is debated in our newspapers and
magazines and TV shows?
What is population control?
Population control is any methodology used to control the type,
location and number of people that inhabit the earth. Public debate
is strictly limited however to non-coercive means in achieving any
one of these goals, especially with regards to population reduction.
An important example of this would be allowing people the free choice
on procreative matters. By using various methodologies both economic
and administrative and educational to dissuade people from having
more children than needed, a stable population base can be created.
It should be noted here that the prevailing viewpoint of the world’s
decision makers is that Population control and environmental
devastation are linked and the former contributes heavily to the
latter. This view is foundational to understand the policies that are
formulated to combat, what is viewed by policy makers as a runaway
population explosion. Indeed, when the Nation Intelligence Council
(NIC) held their Global Trends Conference they identified seven key
drivers that would shape the globe through the year 2015. The first
was demographics; the second was natural resources and environment.
[i] These trends are of the utmost importance to understand if we
are to understand the motives and policies that are driving the
population control agenda. Related terms and policy paradigms and
nomenclature are ‘Sustainable Development’, ‘Agenda 21′, `Rio
Conference’ `Biodiversity Treaty’, `Bioshpere Reserves’, `World
Heritage Treaty’, `Ecosystem Management’, `Desertification Treaty’,
Ecosystem Management etc. The idea that there are too many people
inhabiting the earth is one that is ingrained in the world’s leaders
and one that, in their view, requires a solution.
What kinds of solutions?
The only socially and psychologically solution available to policy
makers when discussing reducing the world’s poplation is education.
While other methods are debated they are rarely employed or even
discussed with any real publicity. These include various methods of
taxation, and other forms of financial disincentives. These methods
are important to note because barring success of the educational
solution track, the financial/administrative[ii] disincentives
administrative will probably become more likely as a method of
reducing populations. However, this method is only really available
where there is some degree of wealth and a fairly well developed
governmental institutions capable of enforcing such a regimen. These
are the regions that are the primary target of the so called
population control agenda; remote, poor, economically underdeveloped
regions of the world. Thus, if global policy makers are to have any
success in their war on population (people), other methods must be
employed.
Malthusian[iii] Maniacs
Americans have truly been blessed. Many nations on Earth do not have
enough food to feed their populations. However, recently the ability
to increase food production is being hindered by bizarre weather
patterns. In various regions on Earth, including in America,
important food production areas are being challenged with floods. In
other places, drought has been a problem. Unfortunately, though
damaging as these natural disasters are, a more troubling danger
contributing to world hunger is that of unequal distribution and
shortages caused not by a lack of supply, but in unsold grain and
food stocks that are kept off the market in order to keep the prices
of grain high. Far from being a nefarious policy, this is done
primarily to keep farmers in business. Despite the many advances,
technologically speaking, in agricultural production techniques,
hunger on a massive scale still exists in many parts of the world.
The intervention of the world’s governments and by private
institutions has been extensive and commendable. Nevertheless, large
pockets of poverty and starvation remain in Portions of Asia, Africa,
and Latin America.
Many of these trends have much of their roots in post-colonial
economic and agricultural policies and others have their roots in
mismanagement by many institutions that have ostensibly attempted to
alleviate hunger and poverty in these regions. Falling commodity
prices in the 1970’s and 1980’s did not help third world nations
whose principle source of hard currency was through these same
commodities. Many of these nations also carried large a foreign debt
load. These debts could only be repaid with the earnings collected
from those commodities, which were increasingly worth less, in
monetary terms. While most of these nations learned to manage their
debt to some degree, it often meant decreased living standards for
much of the rest of the population in these nations. The lack of a
coherent and successful policy in the 1970’s and 1980’s is leaving
increasing problems in Africa in particular as it is one of the few
region in the world where poverty, epidemics and ethnic violence are
converging on a continent at the same time. Unfortunately where such
misery exists there are always a few vile men who will attempt to
exploit the situation for all its worth. Even using a starving means
need to “influence” their “behavior”. Such moral perversity can be
found in the United Nations food program.
“Food is power. We use it to change behavior, some may call it
bribery. We do not apologize.”-Catherine Bertini, executive director
of the U.N. World Food Program.
The idea in the minds of most people is that the UN is a benevolent
organization who wishes only to help the helpless and bring peace to
the world. I submit to you that it is not. While in the past the UN
has helped some. It usually does so when the bright lights of
publicity are shining and the CNN cameras are rolling. In reality, a
review of the action of the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and to a lesser degree, the Bank of International
Settlements (BIS), all of which are associate agencies of the UN,
have used their money creating authority to loan money to third world
nations, at interest, ostensibly to help these countries with much
needed development. Because these nations have only one thing the
west wants, its natural resources (commodities), these nations once
they default, become the economic vassals of the IMF and the World
Bank. This is one of the reasons there are so many problems in
Africa today. Despite the veiled attempts by the national
establishment media to portray to the American people that Africa
cannot take care of itself, often the real problem is the austerity
measures which frequently take the form of price controls and
currency devaluation’s which take an enormous toll on the general
population in these struggling nations. Often the prognostications of
the experts of these economic organizations deliberately overvalue
the price of commodities produced by these developing nations thereby
making them eligible for larger loan amounts. It has been argued
back and forth by the banks supporters and detractors weather or not
the World Bank is truly in business to help the poor nations out of
their poverty, or simply an instrument for the rich nations to
plunder the natural resources of the poor nations. It is a debate
that will certainly continue, that is, until the remaining portions
of that wealth is in the hands of the corporations and money-
changers.
One of the first victims of this unseen war is the children of these
nations. As living standards in these already poor nations’
declines, the children are often forced to work to help make ends
meet in these families. Food becomes scarce as social conditions
deteriorate. This often adds fuel to the fire of already tense
ethnic tensions with violence the frequent result. The World Bank
and the IMF are very much part of the problem in this region of the
World. The most important reason these nefarious policies can
continue is that, first, the mainstream media simply don’t report the
facts to the American people and secondly, because most Americans are
too busy to make more than a cursory look at these institutions and
have no desire to look beyond the catch-all phrases to really care.
But today we do have some people who are attempting to sound the
alarm bells. The turmoil in the Asian markets in late 1997 and 1998
showed an increasing debate as to the role of the international
financial institutions. Hopefully, the debate will move into
directions which will lead to reform of these institutions and a
reduction in their role in profiting from human misery. It may also
help alleviate the swirling mystery of how these institutions make
some bizarre and at times abominable decisions, brought on by the
World Bank’s obsession with secrecy. What are they doing with our
taxpayer money that they don’t want anyone to know about? In this day
and age, it would seem impossible to imagine a world without the
likes of the money-changers. However, the use of debt to help out
others is not a sound way to help thy neighbor. The use of other
peoples money to loan out to basket case economies for private
profit, lends itself to a very, dangerous and immoral situation which
the people accept all too willingly, mostly out of abject ignorance
Unfortunately, there seems to be another purpose to the United
Nations policy makers, which with a little investigation, reveals
itself in the oft repeated slogan of population control. Population
control is rooted in the idea that the world’s population is
increasing too rapidly and is outstripping natural resources.
“We must speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about
abortion, about values that control population, because the
ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the
population by 90 percent and there aren’t enough people left to do a
great deal of ecological damage.”
These remarks were spoken by Dr. Sam Keen, a new age writer, at the
1996 Gorbachev conference in San Francisco. His remarked were
received with warm applause, by the new “Intellectuals”. How he
proposes to do away with 5 billion people was, of course, never
discussed.
“My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two
years, it had eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT in
hindsight is that it had greatly added to the population problem.”
This statement was made by Alexander King, president of the Club of
Rome, a think tank for elitist and socialist ideas, which interlocks
with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral
Commission. Now according to the National Academy of Sciences, DDT
had prevented 500 million deaths. Consequently, the Globalists set
out to ban the use of DDT, not because it wasn’t effective or safe,
but because it saved human lives. To these butchers, the
preservation of human life is evil, letting hundreds of millions of
people die is good.
Let us look at Africa, the Rwanda situation should have sent off
alarm bells to the American people, unfortunately, during those
massacres the WWF, and Bart Simpson were also on television,
consequently, little attention was paid by the American masses. The
Genocide first began in April of 1994. In the Early 1990’s the Hutu
led military issued decrees disarming the largely Christian Tutsi’s.
After the Tutsi’s were disarmed, the Hutu’s, using machetes massacred
800,000 Tutsi’s. Please take note, Madeline Albright[i] insisted the
word Genocide not be used. This is because such a word must call for
trials. American foreign policy did not want that to happen. One
must wonder if the American foreign policy establishment really
wanted the murder to come to an end before any neighboring African
troops intervened, as American troops prevented others form entering
in to render medical assistance to the sick and dying. Now the
Hutu’s, after their faithful slaughter, has received millions of
dollars in aid from no other source than the US Government. What is
ignored is that fact the weapon of choice was the machete, a weapon
easily outclassed by a simple machine gun. The argument that the
safety of any intervening troops, the primary consideration for
denying entry in to the ravaged areas, simply lacks credibility. The
press, course, as the faithful and diligent defender of the elite,
took its pre-scripted role of mute silence, was remiss in not
explaining who and why no help was sent.
Time would fail me to discuss the effects on population that the HIV
virus has had in Africa, where some of the infection rates in African
militaries are over 75%. Whether you believe AIDS is man made or
naturally occurring, the effects on population has been the same. Let
me ask this question? Since when has having an incurable, contagious
disease which just so happens to be transmitted through the act of
reproduction (that is, making more people) been treated like a
protected status, where some have even called for special rights? Has
this helped curtail or spread the disease? Since when has our
society shown such kindness on people whose illness is always fatal?
Since when have our leaders been so quick to move to protect the
homosexual population, (whose sexual activities coincidentally do not
bring about procreation), while largely understating the effects of
AIDS in Africa? One factor seems to be increasing clear, it is Africa
that is the target. Resource rich, beautiful Africa, populated with
what Margeret Sanger, the Founder of Planned Parenthood
called, `human weeds’, that is, Black people[ii]. The Infamous
Tuskeegee study is another interesting scene in the panorama of
America’s medical experiments. Here black men were, after, being told
they were being treated for their illness, (syphilis) were
deliberately kept from medicines which would cure them, so that
doctors could observe the effects of syphilis on men.
One must wonder when we will see crematoriums and gas chambers in
America.
Let us consider the Abortion issue, once again it coincides
completely with the population control agenda; the less people born
the better. This form of murder seems far less objectionable to many
Americans because the human life killed has no one to mourn for it,
especially when its own mother is the butcher. When the abortion
issue is raised, it is almost invariably raised in conjunction with
the poor and yes, we have it again, black’s. The implication here is
that `these people’, according to much of what we hear from many
quarters, cannot control themselves, and if more of “them” are born
it will just add to the burden of welfare and crime to our
societies. Margaret Sanger who I mentioned before was the founder of
Planned Parenthood, she organized the “Negro project” this was
designed to eliminate what she believed to be an inferior race of
people:
“The Masses of Negroes… particularly from the south, still breed
carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among
Negroes, even more than among whites is from that portion of the
population least intelligent and fit.”- Margaret Sanger- The Negro
Project[iii].
As you can see Planned Parenthood has some interesting beginnings
that are not generally known, for obvious reasons.
Ms. Sanger also intended to hire some black ministers to propagandize
for birth control.
“The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through
Religious appeal. We do not want word to get out that we want to
exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can
straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more
rebellious members.”- Margaret Sanger[iv]
Yes, the Ghost of Adolph Hitler is alive and well. It has been living
in America for 50 some years, in the person of our Presidents[v], who
support organizations such as Planned Parenthood[vi] and their
Cabinets, many of our Doctors and Senators, in our corporate board
rooms and in our living rooms, in our news rooms and in our schools.
The American people are just like the Germans so many years ago, in
denial. Until the stench of rotting corpses was unmistakable, most
Germans were also in denial. Even then, most simply shut their eyes
from seeing. Those that do see are cowering in the dark, knowing
full well what awaits them if they speak out. A few are speaking out,
but only a few, Americans may be able to hear them during a
commercial break, while watching another inane sitcom or perhaps
another sports extravaganza. That is provided, they aren’t doped up
or drunk. Of course the infantile refrain is `you know, it can’t
happen here, this is America!’ Of course `America’ is the magic word
and all corruption and evil magically disappear when you say
America!! And if you, as an American, really believe that, then you
have definitely been watching too much T.V.!
Blood is crying from the ground, the desire of those who are
formulating UN population policy have all made target estimates of
500 million to 3 billion people as the ideal population of Earth.
Some have stated that it is imperative that this be accomplished,
soon, by any available means.
“At present the population of the world is increasing … War so far
has had no great effect on this increase … I do not pretend that
birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from
increasing. There are others … If a Black Death could be spread
throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could
procreate freely without making the world too full … the state of
affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-
minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of
others.” - Bertrand Russell[vii]
Population control is a integral part of the Globalist agenda. One
18 January 2006, 1:30 ampoint that should be made here is that the Nazi’s own population
control agenda was formulated and executed with extreme secrecy.
While the Jews of Germany were horribly persecuted and demonized by
the state, the systematic extermination of the Jews was not a
publicly announced policy. All notes of the Wannsee Conference,
where the policy of extermination was planned and discussed, were to
be burned and the topic of the conference was held in extreme
secrecy. So consider this dear reader, while all the signs were
present that this is what Hitler had planned for the Jews, the actual
policy was carried out secretly. History is repeating itself today.
Far too many suspicions diseases are being discovered and the deaths
of far too many micro-biologists who work in genetics are happening
to all be a just a ‘coincidence’. Coincidence theorists are the ones
who would stand by and watch the holocaust happen all over again
while they cling to their religion of ‘coincidental denial’[iv].
Today or at least very soon, it will be possible to create viruses
that only kill certain races of people, thus using science (just like
the Nazi’s) to exterminate people with a high degree of secrecy. This
will be a possibility that no one really will consider until great
swaths of the human family have been wiped out by a few powerful and
satanically inspired people. Secrecy will work greatly to the
advantage of these evil men because anyone who speaks about it can be
labeled a ‘conspiracy nut’ while the body bags are being filled. This
is working now as a successful tact, as many much of the population
of Africa has been decimated by AIDS and any who questions the
suspicious causes of the disease, the extremely ineffective methods
employed in
dial up user:
Stan, you really need to start compressing the photos and images on your blog. They take forever to download. You should be able to to this easily with photoshop or the many free image compression programs out there.
Just a friendly suggestion
10 February 2006, 1:03 pmskol:
I’ve been thinking about this “Hubris of Youth” thing. Are we (I’m only 19) antithetical to what’s going on here at FS or IA? (And by “we”, I SORT OF mean “me”, but it is a general question).
This site has educated many of us, and for that I thank Stan and absolutely every commenter. But if you’d prefer some of us to go into lurk-mode or something similar… I’d just like a general opinion if there is one.
I believe Marilyn brought this point up a while ago, also.
STAN: No such intention within the critique. The hubris of youth has become generalized throughout society. Note I begin by criticizing the notion of Youth at all. Age segregation, as concomitant to division of labor - think about public schools, legal notions of age-of-majority, etc - CREATES a category called youth. Metropolitan consumerism, as an aspect of a late imperialist division of economic labor between nations, has expressed consumer-ISM, which in turn played a HUGE role in the develoment of “youth culture,” the cultural artifact of age segregation.
In Haiti, if one goes to the countryside, the notion of “adolescence” is non-existent.
Consumerism - which also entails a relentless and colossal effort at demand-production (mass media advertizing, tyranny of fashion, etc) - promotes the idea that social proficiency (looking for a better worde than “mastery” here), which should theoretically increase with age by virtue of accumulation of experience, is gained by (1) ownership of high-status commodities and (2) social “performance”. The ad industry, et al, as well as liberal law, sell entitlement as a kind of leveling. That was the point of the contact-lens example.
In a society where “youth” is imprisoned daily in a zoo-keeping, rubber-stampinig school system, and give NO right to pariticipate in decision making (either in civic or family life), the age of majority is tantamount to and end-of-sentence date. One day you have no rights; the next day you have them all. This is internalized as unfocused rebelliousness combined with the society-wide indoctrination against critical pattern recognition (critical thinking). How could it be otherwise?
So when the young woman says there are no such things as women, we are seeing:
(1) a desire to shock, as an expression of understandable rebellion
(2) a failure of critical thinking that makes an assertion as “valuable” as a supported assertion
(3) “identity” a commodity-selection process
(4) a pugnaciousness that comes with the ability to “walk away” now that the sentence of childhood is over
etc etc
Dichotomous thinking is part of that indoctrination, everything is a set of dual-antagonisms. When I criticize the “hubris of youth”, it is a general social system criticism, not a slam against young people - who I value very much. It does not automatically mean that we don’t want “youth”, any more than our critiques of suburban life mean we don’t want to reach people in the ‘burbs.
I apologize if anything I wrote sent the message that youth should not particpate; and I hope I was clear that I abhor the kind of power-tripping many old heads pull on young folk. “Youth” is an imposed category in our society, and one I want to see young PEOPLE liberated from.
Moreover, you and ther young people who are politically engaged are already more disentangled fromthe system than the majority of the privileged within metropolitan society are in a state of sustained “adolescence,” because - as De points out - metro society infantilizes its citizens.
20 January 2007, 12:10 amskol:
Thank you for the kind response. You did not suggest anything; I’m just an exceptional projector of my insecurities, and what homo out of high school isn’t
20 January 2007, 7:54 pm