Abu Ghraib – Newly Released War Porn

Video Link to New Images from Abu Ghraib

Of particular interest to me are the many essays that the photos from Abu Ghraib which consider the political implications of photography itself, especially violent imagery. The context for interpreting the Abu Ghraib photos has been their use of the conventions of commercial pornography, the travel photo, the trophy image, the digital phone and camera, and the sending of pictures over the Internet. – Julia Lesage

D. A. Clarke’s essay, “Prostitution for everyone: Feminism, globalization, and the ‘sex’ industry,” is one of the most extensive and thought-provoking essays in Not for Sale. With unflinching honesty, Clarke points out the interconnectedness of the systems of oppression, noting that globalization nurtures male violence against women, noting that the documentation of torture at Abu Ghraib is yet another form of pornography, noting that if we are to be successful in our work as feminists, then we must attack the entire system, not just parts. If we are to have our revolution, we must begin with honesty-with ourselves and each other. Clarke argues, “For feminists seeking allies against the traffickers of women and kids, the men of the traditional Left and Right remain fairly useless.” – Laura Newland

The will to domination permeates the propaganda of the flesh, including the rather specialized variety exemplified by the Abu Ghraib photo-montage of Arabic degradation. Cruelty and role-playing, creating and reinforcing stereotypes of dominance and submission, are key elements of what can only be called pornoganda. – Justin Raimando

I have seen a lot of hand-wringing about these photos, but so far I haven’t seen anyone discuss them as pornography. I don’t have a whole lot of personal experience with pornography, but it seems to me like these pictures would pass most of the tests: naked bodies, stripped of individual identity by the bags over their heads, simulate sex for the cameras while the only clothed subject who still has a face – the American soldier who is symbolically fucking these bodies – grins with evident pleasure. – The Plaid Adder

Last year, when the Abu Ghraib crisis came data-streaming out of our boob tubes, we were treated to the now-memorized tiny handful of photos – photos showing a woman gloating over dead bodies and a woman holding male prisoners on a leash. In June, 2004, Zillah Eisenstein would describe these women as “gender decoys.” Everyone knows the name of the sketchy Ms. Lyndie England these days, and they have all but forgotten the name of her lumpen-Svengali, Charles Graner, who was a creepy civilian prison guard with a history of abuse before he took up the uniform to become part of the ironically named Operation Iraqi Freedom. – Me

The latter is an excerpt from the seris on sexual aggression in the US military, which is also covered in depth in the pdf book, “Sex & War.”

The link at the top was provided to me by the excellent new site The Progressive iNdependent.

2 Comments

  1. James M:

    “Here we have these pictures of homoeroticism that look like standard good old American pornography.”

    –Rush Limbaugh, referring to Abu Ghraib photos

  2. Jeri L. Reed:

    You know I can’t really write about this because I take it too personally, but the main thing that makes it pornography is that people in this country viewed it as such, I mean they viewed it, they couldn’t get enough pictures. At the time these pictures were released, which was one of the worst times of my life despite the fact that my son just got out of there safely, I was moderating a list of military families–who you would think would not want to view these pictures. Many people sent in every picture they could possibly find for posting–I did not post any of them, but was appalled that Americans, and probably people all over the world, were downloading and sharing them.And it was all free, a lot cheaper than other porn on the web. Next came the Nicholas Berg beheading, which too many people watched 80 or 90 times, or at least that’s what they wrote, allegedly to prove some theory or the other, as if this was part of their anti-war work. That was evidently porn of some kind as well. this is some kind of deep sickness. I don’t know, I can’t look at these, I have viewed very few of them and have never watched the Berg video. At the big march in DC last fall, I got very upset at the huge sign some people carried showing the hooded figure, I felt like I should not get that upset but did not want them to carry it, somehow I felt it was just short hand for this ugly porn show, that even though they meant to protest by selecting that symbol they were somehow also tittilated by it

    Can’t intellectualize, sorry.

    Jeri

Leave a comment