Gail Dines on CNN & Fool’s Paradise

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me a couple of dozen times, and shame on me — but also shame on what passes for journalism on television.

This truism comes to mind after my appearance on “Paula Zahn Now” on CNN this week to discuss the Duke rape case. I’m not naïve about these kinds of shows — which I know are not really about journalism but about ratings, most easily obtained through sensationalism and playing to the prejudices of the audience — but over the past 20 years I’ve gone on a number of them to discuss my work as a sociologist on issues of racism and sexism in media. Like many progressives, I do that with eyes wide open, knowing the limits but realizing it’s one of the few shots we have at a mass audience.

But this time I foolishly had high hopes after a producer from Zahn’s show actually conducted a thoughtful screening interview, unlike any I had spoken with in the past. Most producers typically are uninterested in my views and tend to ask banal questions in these pre-interviews over the phone. They usually don’t care about my arguments, but simply want to check that I have a big mouth (which, I admit, I do) and will not freeze in fear when the cameras roll. When they recognize that I am not someone who is likely to cower in the face of adversarial arguments, that’s enough for them.

But this CNN producer kept grilling me with FULL

3 Comments

  1. peggy:

    Off-topic, but below is the story of a woman I loved, and who could ever replace her?

    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070219/molly_ivins

  2. Audrey:

    Yet another story of a man buying a woman was in the news this week. “There are many aspects of life that an able-bodied person takes for granted but from which I am excluded.” The story is a glimpse into what it’s like to be a man who doesn’t have what men are supposed to take for granted – the right of access to female bodies. (Any aspects of the woman’s life and what women take for granted are apparently not relevant to this news item.) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/27/nvirgin27.xml

  3. demonista:

    Oh, yes, because we all know that every man has a god-given or nature-given right to ejaculate inside a woman’s body. Because, after all, the only value of prostitutes is the value men find in objectifying, buying, selling, raping, etc. them.
    *sarcasm done*

    Seriously though, what in the hell? Why do people honestly believe that men have the right to get “sex” (orgasm inside the body of) women, including through deception, monetary coercion, etc? Oh wait, I know. We live in Patriarchyland.

Leave a comment