<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boundaries of Executive Power (3) &#8211; fait acompli Shakedown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/</link>
	<description>Making the Connections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-340357</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-340357</guid>
		<description>And if you don&#039;t like our trash, don&#039;t ask any questions, or we&#039;ll give it to you good and hard:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adDANopNzewM

 Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve General Counsel Scott Alvarez said audits of monetary policy by the U.S. Congress could lead to higher interest rates and reduced confidence in central bank policy.

Congressional audits of monetary policy could “cause the markets and the public to lose confidence in the independence of the judgments of the Federal Reserve,” Alvarez told the House Financial Services Committee today in response to a question from Representative Dennis Moore, a Kansas Democrat. Alvarez said in his prepared remarks the audits would probably “chill” the central bank’s discussions on interest rates.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his colleagues are trying to persuade lawmakers not to pass legislation sponsored by Representative Ron Paul of Texas that would repeal the central bank’s immunity to audits of monetary policy. Fed officials used emergency powers to protect creditors of Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc. during the financial crisis, prompting congressional scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you don&#8217;t like our trash, don&#8217;t ask any questions, or we&#8217;ll give it to you good and hard:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adDANopNzewM" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adDANopNzewM</a></p>
<p> Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Federal Reserve General Counsel Scott Alvarez said audits of monetary policy by the U.S. Congress could lead to higher interest rates and reduced confidence in central bank policy.</p>
<p>Congressional audits of monetary policy could “cause the markets and the public to lose confidence in the independence of the judgments of the Federal Reserve,” Alvarez told the House Financial Services Committee today in response to a question from Representative Dennis Moore, a Kansas Democrat. Alvarez said in his prepared remarks the audits would probably “chill” the central bank’s discussions on interest rates.</p>
<p>Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his colleagues are trying to persuade lawmakers not to pass legislation sponsored by Representative Ron Paul of Texas that would repeal the central bank’s immunity to audits of monetary policy. Fed officials used emergency powers to protect creditors of Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc. during the financial crisis, prompting congressional scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddhalovesPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-292327</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddhalovesPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-292327</guid>
		<description>Charles,
I have been waiting to hear from you.  Maybe you have been busy and have not had a chance to read my answer to the question you asked me.  Sometimes in the past I have asked people questions and I did not want to comment on what they wrote for one reason or another but I did write that I saw what they wrote.  That way they, or in this case I,
will not think that they spent their time writing in vain.
with friendly greetings,
BLP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,<br />
I have been waiting to hear from you.  Maybe you have been busy and have not had a chance to read my answer to the question you asked me.  Sometimes in the past I have asked people questions and I did not want to comment on what they wrote for one reason or another but I did write that I saw what they wrote.  That way they, or in this case I,<br />
will not think that they spent their time writing in vain.<br />
with friendly greetings,<br />
BLP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddhalovesPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291786</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddhalovesPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291786</guid>
		<description>OK to finish where I left off.  In my opinion the idea that the use of violence is never justified as a political means to achieve political ends is not itself justified.   Yet if some people come to the conclusion that violence is never justified as a political means they should certainly be supported.  A goal of achieving a world without violence is certainly one worthy to strive for but it is one that has to be achieved together.  If 90% of the people are pacifists and the other 10% are criminals those 10% will have a decisive advantage in political clout.
I do not see military service in and of itself a crime.  Unfortunately I think people in today&#039;s US military confuse military service in a hypothetical country in a theoretical time on planet earth with service in the US military in the 21st Century.  Even in earlier times service was not honorable but it was not as dishonorable.
In the 19th century war as a means of expansion was considered normal.  In the 20th century there was a least a cover story that was good enough in my opinion to confuse the issues of the morality of service in the US military.  In the 21st Century only bird brain could think that the US is any thing other than the new evil empire.   (No apology to anyone with a bird on their uniform who might happen to see this.  I give you my own bird, a cuckoo bird)  If someone wants to serve honorably as a soldier let them join the Swiss or Finnish or Venezuelan military.
For people who might read this and are sure that they could never kill another human being I would like you to think creatively about what you can support.  Preaching is of course the obvious route but even Jesus overturned the money tables that were in or near the house of worship.  That was clearly an act of sabotage.  He could of been killed himself by an angry businessman.  
Preaching is important. Still, it is a very slow way of making changes.  My spouse accuses those who would do more than preach, especially those who would use violence, of just being egotistical butt heads who just want to go down in history as another George Washington, or Vladimir Lenin, or Che Guevara.  Perhaps, but I think the moral thing to do when faced with the question of how to deal with injustice is cost benefit risk analysis.  It is true that our human analysis is very flawed.  But we are forced by the fact that we are alive in a time and space dimension to do the best job that we can.   God might be here watching us but it is not clear that she is directly controlling what goes on.  Therefore that makes me the XO.  Ok perhaps not the XO. That is my spouse. But I am at least the First Sergeant of at least my own small unit.  First Sergeants do not tell XOs everything that they are up to.  
Even if our risk benefit cost analysis goes horribly wrong we can never be sure that if we had followed another course of action things would not have turned out even worse.  Therefore it would be possible for those who supported the Iraq invasion then to say that it was justified.  Yes they could say it but the reason that the rest of us haves brains is to evaluate the likely hood of that claim.  I say the supporters of the Iraq invasion are either liars or fools.  Unfortunately we can never know for sure who is right.
Now I think someone may wish to question me on what factors or variables should be used in our risk benefits and costs analysis.  But that is the subject of another book.
For now it is my opinion that the best course of action is counter recruiting and infiltrating political leftist who are willing to use violence in to the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, and military.  Some of you may scoff at me as being an unrealistic dreamer but it has been done before.  I am not a racist or a nationalist if other countries can have left wing military coups so can the US.
If that sounds undemocratic to you I say that any country who has citizens who can not control their military are citizens who do not deserve democracy.  Any so called citizens who would stand in the way of arresting war criminals are accomplices and would become felons themselves if they attempted to hinder a left wing military coup.  The historical record justifying such a course of action is overwhelming.  
Love is an important word on this site.  Some people that I have spoken to accuse me of spewing hatred.  I prefer to look at it this way.  If I can love my enemies how much more love can I have for their victims?  I recognize that criminals, especially the rich and powerful ones are also victims.  They are victims of being born into or acquiring positions of power in which they have trouble imagining being held accountable for their crimes.  Because of that they have much more temptation to abuse their public trust.  That is why I say an example has to be made out of them.  One that generations of school children will talk about for 1000 years so that the temptation of future powerful politicos will be much much less than the temptation America&#039;s rich and powerful faced, which was to much for them to handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK to finish where I left off.  In my opinion the idea that the use of violence is never justified as a political means to achieve political ends is not itself justified.   Yet if some people come to the conclusion that violence is never justified as a political means they should certainly be supported.  A goal of achieving a world without violence is certainly one worthy to strive for but it is one that has to be achieved together.  If 90% of the people are pacifists and the other 10% are criminals those 10% will have a decisive advantage in political clout.<br />
I do not see military service in and of itself a crime.  Unfortunately I think people in today&#8217;s US military confuse military service in a hypothetical country in a theoretical time on planet earth with service in the US military in the 21st Century.  Even in earlier times service was not honorable but it was not as dishonorable.<br />
In the 19th century war as a means of expansion was considered normal.  In the 20th century there was a least a cover story that was good enough in my opinion to confuse the issues of the morality of service in the US military.  In the 21st Century only bird brain could think that the US is any thing other than the new evil empire.   (No apology to anyone with a bird on their uniform who might happen to see this.  I give you my own bird, a cuckoo bird)  If someone wants to serve honorably as a soldier let them join the Swiss or Finnish or Venezuelan military.<br />
For people who might read this and are sure that they could never kill another human being I would like you to think creatively about what you can support.  Preaching is of course the obvious route but even Jesus overturned the money tables that were in or near the house of worship.  That was clearly an act of sabotage.  He could of been killed himself by an angry businessman.<br />
Preaching is important. Still, it is a very slow way of making changes.  My spouse accuses those who would do more than preach, especially those who would use violence, of just being egotistical butt heads who just want to go down in history as another George Washington, or Vladimir Lenin, or Che Guevara.  Perhaps, but I think the moral thing to do when faced with the question of how to deal with injustice is cost benefit risk analysis.  It is true that our human analysis is very flawed.  But we are forced by the fact that we are alive in a time and space dimension to do the best job that we can.   God might be here watching us but it is not clear that she is directly controlling what goes on.  Therefore that makes me the XO.  Ok perhaps not the XO. That is my spouse. But I am at least the First Sergeant of at least my own small unit.  First Sergeants do not tell XOs everything that they are up to.<br />
Even if our risk benefit cost analysis goes horribly wrong we can never be sure that if we had followed another course of action things would not have turned out even worse.  Therefore it would be possible for those who supported the Iraq invasion then to say that it was justified.  Yes they could say it but the reason that the rest of us haves brains is to evaluate the likely hood of that claim.  I say the supporters of the Iraq invasion are either liars or fools.  Unfortunately we can never know for sure who is right.<br />
Now I think someone may wish to question me on what factors or variables should be used in our risk benefits and costs analysis.  But that is the subject of another book.<br />
For now it is my opinion that the best course of action is counter recruiting and infiltrating political leftist who are willing to use violence in to the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, and military.  Some of you may scoff at me as being an unrealistic dreamer but it has been done before.  I am not a racist or a nationalist if other countries can have left wing military coups so can the US.<br />
If that sounds undemocratic to you I say that any country who has citizens who can not control their military are citizens who do not deserve democracy.  Any so called citizens who would stand in the way of arresting war criminals are accomplices and would become felons themselves if they attempted to hinder a left wing military coup.  The historical record justifying such a course of action is overwhelming.<br />
Love is an important word on this site.  Some people that I have spoken to accuse me of spewing hatred.  I prefer to look at it this way.  If I can love my enemies how much more love can I have for their victims?  I recognize that criminals, especially the rich and powerful ones are also victims.  They are victims of being born into or acquiring positions of power in which they have trouble imagining being held accountable for their crimes.  Because of that they have much more temptation to abuse their public trust.  That is why I say an example has to be made out of them.  One that generations of school children will talk about for 1000 years so that the temptation of future powerful politicos will be much much less than the temptation America&#8217;s rich and powerful faced, which was to much for them to handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddhalovesPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291679</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddhalovesPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291679</guid>
		<description>Just a short note on something that was on the front page of the german paper today that I find very interesting.
3 members of the German Bundesnachrichtendienst have been arrested in Kosovo for trying to bomb the the EU headquarters.  I wonder if they were trying to follow my orders hahahahahahahaha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a short note on something that was on the front page of the german paper today that I find very interesting.<br />
3 members of the German Bundesnachrichtendienst have been arrested in Kosovo for trying to bomb the the EU headquarters.  I wonder if they were trying to follow my orders hahahahahahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddhalovesPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291678</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddhalovesPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291678</guid>
		<description>I believe Cheney made his statement as a counter argument to the complaint that the Iraq war was expensive.
As to my own opinion about monetary and fiscal policy I do not have one at this moment. I have this feeling that some important piece of the puzzle (picture) is missing.  
What I have no doubt about is that not only did the US government launch a very obvious war of aggression against Iraq in 2003 but that the US government has launched many other wars of aggression against emerging democracies since the end of the second world war.  These clearly known facts make the US government the world&#039;s largest continuing criminal enterprise.  
Furthermore I am not certain but I strongly suspect that assassination of President Kennedy and the 9-11 attacks could have been stopped before they happened.  I also strongly suspect that the current crisis in the banking industry could have been averted.  I am also concerned that there are at least elements in the US military industrial complex that are trying to put the US in a position that the US could launch a nuclear first strike against any country on the planet.
I find it interesting that when some crazy person goes on a rampage and kills a dozen people or a serial killer gets caught after killing 2 dozen people the American people show some outrage yet when the power structure kills many multitudes of that it seems to be the governments perogative.  Yet by my own admission if I could get someone to follow my orders it is possible that a lot of people would be killed.
(I have to finish this another time.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Cheney made his statement as a counter argument to the complaint that the Iraq war was expensive.<br />
As to my own opinion about monetary and fiscal policy I do not have one at this moment. I have this feeling that some important piece of the puzzle (picture) is missing.<br />
What I have no doubt about is that not only did the US government launch a very obvious war of aggression against Iraq in 2003 but that the US government has launched many other wars of aggression against emerging democracies since the end of the second world war.  These clearly known facts make the US government the world&#8217;s largest continuing criminal enterprise.<br />
Furthermore I am not certain but I strongly suspect that assassination of President Kennedy and the 9-11 attacks could have been stopped before they happened.  I also strongly suspect that the current crisis in the banking industry could have been averted.  I am also concerned that there are at least elements in the US military industrial complex that are trying to put the US in a position that the US could launch a nuclear first strike against any country on the planet.<br />
I find it interesting that when some crazy person goes on a rampage and kills a dozen people or a serial killer gets caught after killing 2 dozen people the American people show some outrage yet when the power structure kills many multitudes of that it seems to be the governments perogative.  Yet by my own admission if I could get someone to follow my orders it is possible that a lot of people would be killed.<br />
(I have to finish this another time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291461</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291461</guid>
		<description>Good questions ,BuddhalovesPaine

Ironically, or scarily, Cheney sounds like a Keynesian here. I&#039;d have to hear the overall context. He&#039;s probably advocating &quot;military Keynesianism&quot;: spend on the military and cut the social spending. Reagan doubled the national _debt_ as it had accumulated going all the way back to Washington, but increased military spending and cut taxes for the rich, initiated the idea of cutting welfare and social spending.

I&#039;m not sure what has happened in Africa or Latin America with respect to deficit spending. &quot;We&quot; say forgive the Third World Debt !

The good thing about the basic and original Keynes approach is that it counsels social spending to put money into the hands of masses, that is to raise mass &quot;effective demand&quot; for &quot;economic stimulus&quot;. The more money people on welfare or unemployment have, the more they buy goods and services.

Thinking more narrowly about the US mainly, the rightwing uses the notion of balanced budget as an excuse to cut social programs in the US federal budget. Of course, they don&#039;t cut the military budget to balance the overall budget. 

What say you ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions ,BuddhalovesPaine</p>
<p>Ironically, or scarily, Cheney sounds like a Keynesian here. I&#8217;d have to hear the overall context. He&#8217;s probably advocating &#8220;military Keynesianism&#8221;: spend on the military and cut the social spending. Reagan doubled the national _debt_ as it had accumulated going all the way back to Washington, but increased military spending and cut taxes for the rich, initiated the idea of cutting welfare and social spending.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what has happened in Africa or Latin America with respect to deficit spending. &#8220;We&#8221; say forgive the Third World Debt !</p>
<p>The good thing about the basic and original Keynes approach is that it counsels social spending to put money into the hands of masses, that is to raise mass &#8220;effective demand&#8221; for &#8220;economic stimulus&#8221;. The more money people on welfare or unemployment have, the more they buy goods and services.</p>
<p>Thinking more narrowly about the US mainly, the rightwing uses the notion of balanced budget as an excuse to cut social programs in the US federal budget. Of course, they don&#8217;t cut the military budget to balance the overall budget. </p>
<p>What say you ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddhalovesPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291147</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddhalovesPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-291147</guid>
		<description>Charles,
But if i remember correctly Keynesian economists favor deficit spending when a country is in or near a recession.
Also if deficits work for the US why have they not worked for the 3rd world?  I mean if deficits, or for that matter fractional reserve banking, can stimulate an (the US) economy why has this system not worked in Africa or Latin America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,<br />
But if i remember correctly Keynesian economists favor deficit spending when a country is in or near a recession.<br />
Also if deficits work for the US why have they not worked for the 3rd world?  I mean if deficits, or for that matter fractional reserve banking, can stimulate an (the US) economy why has this system not worked in Africa or Latin America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-290743</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-290743</guid>
		<description>Cheney said that deficits do not matter. Could he actually be right?

^^^^
Keynesian,or social democratic, economic theory favors and advocates deficit spending fiscal policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheney said that deficits do not matter. Could he actually be right?</p>
<p>^^^^<br />
Keynesian,or social democratic, economic theory favors and advocates deficit spending fiscal policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-290742</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-290742</guid>
		<description>Letter signed by 387 economists: first proposal help state and local governments.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/economists-letter-to-congress-in-support-of-a-new-economic-stimulus-package/ 

November 19, 2008
The Honorable Henry Reid The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Senate Majority Leader Speaker of the House
Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable John Boehner
Senate Minority Leader House Minority Leader
Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515
Dear Sen. Reid, Sen. McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Rep. Boehner:
We, the undersigned economists, urge Congress to pass a new stimulus package as
quickly as possible. The need to deal with financial turmoil has directed attention away
from the &quot;real&quot; economy. But the latest data clearly show that the economy is entering a
serious recession, initiated by the collapse of homebuilding and intensified by the
paralysis of credit markets. Without a fast an effective response by government, the
economy could continue to spiral downward, leading to a large increase in
unemployment and a sharp decline in GDP.
The potential severity of the downturn suggests that a boost to demand on the order of
2.0-3.0 percent of GDP ($300-$400 billion) would be appropriate, with the goal being to
get this money spent quickly. The list of targets includes:
a) aid to state and local governments that are being forced to make emergency
cutbacks as revenues fall;
b) extending unemployment insurance and increasing other benefits targeted toward
low and moderate income households who are likely to spend quickly;
c) moving forward infrastructure projects that have already been planned and
scheduled; and
d) providing tax credits and other support for &quot;green&quot; projects that can be done
quickly, such as retrofitting homes and businesses for increased energy
efficiency.
The sharp falloff in demand resulting from the collapse of the housing bubble and the
destruction of financial wealth means that there is little reason to fear that enlarged
deficits will raise interest rates and deter private investment. It is far more likely that an
effective stimulus package will promote investment by improving prospects for higher
sales and profits.
With little downside risk and much potential gain, it is important that Congress move
quickly and decisively. Delay can only deepen and prolong the recession.
Sincerely,
Economists’ Letter to Congress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letter signed by 387 economists: first proposal help state and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/economists-letter-to-congress-in-support-of-a-new-economic-stimulus-package/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/economists-letter-to-congress-in-support-of-a-new-economic-stimulus-package/</a> </p>
<p>November 19, 2008<br />
The Honorable Henry Reid The Honorable Nancy Pelosi<br />
Senate Majority Leader Speaker of the House<br />
Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515<br />
The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable John Boehner<br />
Senate Minority Leader House Minority Leader<br />
Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515<br />
Dear Sen. Reid, Sen. McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Rep. Boehner:<br />
We, the undersigned economists, urge Congress to pass a new stimulus package as<br />
quickly as possible. The need to deal with financial turmoil has directed attention away<br />
from the &#8220;real&#8221; economy. But the latest data clearly show that the economy is entering a<br />
serious recession, initiated by the collapse of homebuilding and intensified by the<br />
paralysis of credit markets. Without a fast an effective response by government, the<br />
economy could continue to spiral downward, leading to a large increase in<br />
unemployment and a sharp decline in GDP.<br />
The potential severity of the downturn suggests that a boost to demand on the order of<br />
2.0-3.0 percent of GDP ($300-$400 billion) would be appropriate, with the goal being to<br />
get this money spent quickly. The list of targets includes:<br />
a) aid to state and local governments that are being forced to make emergency<br />
cutbacks as revenues fall;<br />
b) extending unemployment insurance and increasing other benefits targeted toward<br />
low and moderate income households who are likely to spend quickly;<br />
c) moving forward infrastructure projects that have already been planned and<br />
scheduled; and<br />
d) providing tax credits and other support for &#8220;green&#8221; projects that can be done<br />
quickly, such as retrofitting homes and businesses for increased energy<br />
efficiency.<br />
The sharp falloff in demand resulting from the collapse of the housing bubble and the<br />
destruction of financial wealth means that there is little reason to fear that enlarged<br />
deficits will raise interest rates and deter private investment. It is far more likely that an<br />
effective stimulus package will promote investment by improving prospects for higher<br />
sales and profits.<br />
With little downside risk and much potential gain, it is important that Congress move<br />
quickly and decisively. Delay can only deepen and prolong the recession.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Economists’ Letter to Congress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddhalovesPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-290673</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddhalovesPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/19/boundaries-of-executive-power-3-fait-acompli-shakedown/#comment-290673</guid>
		<description>Rev. Jose M. Tirado´,
Yes it is very interesting how one can always reach a deeper level of understanding.  Perhaps by 2013 we will be on the road to creating a civilization that provides the best of 1913 and 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev. Jose M. Tirado´,<br />
Yes it is very interesting how one can always reach a deeper level of understanding.  Perhaps by 2013 we will be on the road to creating a civilization that provides the best of 1913 and 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

